I contacted the page after seeing him tagged in a few status' on facebook and was told that their twinplate 230mm kit is rated to 900lb-ft and it is a bit more upmarket looking than anything else I've seen before - it certainly looks like a well made kit. I don't know if it would be bang on perfect for a road car with a 4. Great for use in Motorsport. For example, we use strictly necessary cookies to provide you with regional pricing information. Hope that this info is useful to anyone currently looking for a conversion kit. This would have to be with the pmc kit or similar , which doesn't come with a clutch. The gs6-53dz six speed is a bit cheaper, potentially stronger and easier to come by.
Used the pmc kit and there sachs clutch. The one I enquired about was their highest rated twinplate kit, rated to 1500nm at a cost of £1500. I know of someone who used this gearbox with a 4. Watching this thread for more information as I am wanting to do the same conversion on my soarer next year. Mine is fine other than the eBay tW t selling me a box with a shot syncro so 2nd and 3rd clunk a bit but all the rest are fine and I think it should have a good top end when it's done as I'm only taking it steady at the mo as I'm not confident in my prop' at the mo. Due to measurements, our parts gearbox adapters and custom flywheels prevents damage to the clutch improper alignment of the engine and transmission. This comes with the adaptor plate, flywheel, and twin plate 4puk clutch setup.
I'm looking to swap out my w58 for a stronger bmw box for my 1jz Datsun 240z. I know I can use the e46 m3 6 speed getrag 420G , and the e46 330d 5 speed but does anyone know if there was any reason I couldn't use the e46 330d 6 speed gs6-53dz? However, if you would like to, you can change your cookie settings at any time. I know the spline count is different, but I'd just use a clutch to suit. There's bound to be some calculators out there too. Thanks for the reply, sounds good. All of our flywheels are designed to work with the original flexplate, thanks to the fact you can easily mount the original starter. Does it hold up to the abuse? According to their facebook page, early tests resulted in a torque rating of 1400nm for this clutch setup.
Hi- sorry for the late reply. The second is probably more well-known, by a company called Driftmoto Nev Payne. Or make a bmw diff fit my Toyota? From memory they're a 24x35 spline input shaft but I could be wrong. They come as either 3. There's bound to be some calculators out there too. I used this calculator when i did my gs5-39dz swap on my 2j. I can't see why it would be.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. I'd like to use the 6 speed because of my diff ratio 5 speeds have a 1:1 5th. I was hoping we could use this thread as a good resource for knowledge regarding this gearbox swap as it still doesnt seem to be anywhere near as common as the E39 530d swap. . The only thing I can think of that could be different is the length of the input shaft, anyone know if they are different?? You may not disable certain types of cookies that are essential to the operation of our website and that are considered strictly necessary cookies.
This is what mines like on a 3. I don't know if it would be bang on perfect for a road car with a 4. Sorry to hear about what happened to your friend, that is shit luck. So looks like it could work out with diffs in factory ratios fairly well. Bumping this thread as surely there must be a few more options available now. I hope to get this some time soon as auto life is killing me and my wallet with shit shifts.
I'll continue updating the thread if I see or find anything more. The gs6-53dz has same ratios upto 5th as the gs5-39dz box. Has he had any problems with the kit, and how does he find it for street use and drifting? I know of someone who used this gearbox with a 4. I'm hoping that they'll release this soon as I'd really like to know more about it and get an accurate value of the price which they intend to sell it for. .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .