This is the third movie and it is not vastly different from the others. If the unnecessary Dol Guldur scenes and the Tauriel storyline were skipped, every good part from the book which is now cut out would have easily fit in. For the first part we got some jolly embellishment. Let's not forget about the scene wherein Legolas grabs a flying bat, or when Bard uses his son Bain to shoot an arrow, which should make him fall but somehow it doesn't, or when Dain and Thorin decide to hug in the middle of a battle, or when Azog somehow manages to float and dramatically opens his eyes. At this point that is a nonsense argument. Gravity scenes, dull Tauriel scenes who fell in love with Kili after having a conversation with him once or twice - same goes for Kili who fell in love with her and even gave her the token his mother, Dis, gave him.
I think Peter Jackson forgot that this story is called The Hobbit because Bilbo is supposed to be the main character, not Thorin. Did he ever get them back? However, if you mess with the story, if you include things that contradict the whole story, and if you essentially kill off the charm and warmth and concept of the book the movie is based on, things get dangerous. Moreover, the dubious editing decisions create some strange and jolting juxtapositions and tonal lurches, and negate the sense of time passing or of great distances being crossed. If I had not read the book, I'd get really annoyed after watching this movie and not knowing what had happened to them. He felt so much love for the world and characters he created, and put so much time, effort and feelings into his work.
After that I just got annoyed every time he appeared and I got especially annoyed by the fact that everyone, even Gandalf, seemed to trust him to actually do what he was told. The Hobbit The Battle of the Five Armies. That is just so much rubbish. It feels as numb and un-passionate as a general sedative. Thorin Oakenshield Benedict Cumberbatch :. Recollect that anybody the passing scene of Sean Bean in Who thinks about pleasant cinematography when the most astounding netting motion picture are made in crazy looking 3D and with totally over-the-top everything! There's plenty of meat here - but where are the bones that hold it all together? It shows that it is a Hollywood product that favors effects and quantity before depth and quality.
At least take a minute to explain how it got divided. Why did this have to be added? Storyline: After the Dragon leaves the Lonely Mountain, the people of Lake-town see a threat coming. In my opinion it's ridiculous to cut something like that out because they were basically the main characters. Armitage and Bilbo provide the best performances of the film - mostly internal; mostly in the eyes - and their farewell is one of the more moving moments in a trilogy that has largely prioritised humour over pathos. If you have any legal issues please contact the appropriate media file owners or host sites.
There was less silly stuff, less stuff that just felt like fillers and the special effects were generally good. But Sauron appears and tries to tempt Galadriel before she is able to cast him and the Nazgul away from the fortress. Gracious, genuine… all things considered, what difference does it make? Did they ever get killed? Why mention Legolas' mother and never explain anything about her at all? Why didn't the movie explain that Bard became King of Dale? The movie kicks off from precisely where the second ended, with the dread dragon Smaug Benedict Cumberbatch descending upon Laketown. After the Dragon leaves the Lonely Mountain, the people of Lake-town see a threat coming. All this now was steamrolled over by the production team of this movie. Synopsis Bilbo and Company are forced to engage in a war against an array of combatants and keep the Lonely Mountain from falling into the hands of a rising darkness.
Dwarves, elves and men must unite, and the hope for Middle-Earth falls into Bilbo's hands. With The Hobbit, not only, but especially The Battle of the Five Armies, moments like this follow each other like canned laughter on Two and a Half Men. Please don't think this is the case in general. It's the one time we really glimpse that signature Jackson oddness, in a wonderful hallucinatory sequence where Thorin imagines he's sinking in a lake of gold. I enjoy it to some degree when running through a Middle-Earth marathon as a whole, but only when the group I'm with will let me roll my eyes and complain about it. The maddened Thorin proceeds to command the Dwarves to block the gates to prevent anyone from entering or leaving. On the one hand, it was great popcorn cinema in that it was very much entertaining and, of course, visually striking.
Meanwhile an army of Orcs led by Azog the Defiler is marching on Erebor, fueled by the rise of the dark lord Sauron. It was on par with the first one for me. I know a lot of Tolkien-fans apparently love this movie and the trilogy. Bilbo sees Thorin going mad and tries to help. The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies 2014 Website streaming film terlengkap dan terbaru dengan kualitas terbaik. I definitely liked this movie better than the second one. This was, after all, the stage of the story where Professor Tolkien finally foregrounded politics and ethics and the machinations of characters ahead of adventure.
Meanwhile, Gandalf is rescued from the Necromancer's prison and his rescuers realize who the Necromancer is. I did like some of the character development especially the inner confliction of Thorin, Thranduil and Bilbo. Orcs, dwarves, elves and people prepare for war. I did enjoy the first trilogy, and thought that the changes Jackson did to the story were sometimes understandable, sometimes acceptable. The Durins Thorin, Kili, Fili didn't get a funeral. Orcs, dwarves, elves and people prepare for war.