As a result, libraries check in, but they never leave. The packages themselves do not take a lot of disk space. I'd probably elect to delete the Installer entry, but I'm not sure there's a really strong motivation either way. Right-click on it and select Run as administrator. Other redistributables came along with specific programs that need those packages to be able to carry out their functions on your Windows-based device. Why do I have so many multiple Visual C++ Redistributable packages installed? So now, on my machine, many different applications all carry with them their own copy of the Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime.
External hard drives are large, cheap, readily available and easy to install and use. Older programs that rely on the previous version continue to use that, and programs that are ready for the new one use it. Therefore, if the reason you wish to uninstall some of them is your computer being intolerably slow, you should not proceed with such a deed — deleting those packages will do you more harm than good. Windows 10 gets the 2012 and 2013 Visual C++ Redistributables. Become a and go ad-free! Thus deleting the files may crash some of your Windows programs or applications.
So you don't need to aggressively trim the list. It was not a disk space issue. Once bitten, twice shy is me. In fact, one would think there would be an economy in eliminating redundancies across the 12 files. Do I need to remove one of these and if so, which one? Will technology ever really be efficient? I also realise that everything I have said may be totally naïve and not at all workable, it was just a thought. Question is this: re fixing msvcp120.
Of course, even running Windows' own program uninstaller can reveal multiple instances of Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable, often with diffferent years and version numbers. Cheers, Yi Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. Typically, this means that the developer has chosen to have the latest package downloaded from Microsoft at installation time. What is Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable package in Windows? In that case, you have to install both redists. If you belong to the second group, you might be wondering what enigmatic Microsoft Visual C++ redistributables are and why you have so many of them installed on your computer.
Any additional versions of the Visual C++ Redistributable you see on your system were installed along with some program that required it. I looked at the installed programs and noticed that there are 5 different updates. This is likely to result in a total mess as a lot of programs may start to play up at once. It all depends on which program you've installed and which architecture it's for x86 for 32-bit and x64 for 64-bit , and what the installed program calls for. To do that, you can use a cloud drive or a portable storage device. But even so, checking for duplicate files showed that roughly half of the files were identical copies of one another.
I have seen all these replicated files on my computer, especially the runtime and net framework files and just like your questioner wondered why all the different versions were there. If you have any feedback, please tell us. If you do that, however, you might mess things up. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact tnmff microsoft. Thus deleting the files may crash some of your Windows applications. Please consider that simple suggestion. My initial machine included Microsoft visual C++ 2005 runtime x64 and x86 on a window 7 64 bit os? Where can I download the latest versions? I have no idea if you need just one or two or all of the several versions that may be installed on your machine.
If you have any concern, please let me know. It's logical to think that Windows probably needs only one of these versions--the most recent. It does seem like there should be a Program of Microsoft Visual C++ Updates that covers any and all Updates for any given Program install or that maybe installed in the future. Also curious if Macs have these kind of issues? Removing them, while tempting, is fairly risky. Your program can only link to msvcr100 or msvcr110, not to both, that is the reason you only need one vcredist per executable.
And, indeed, that was the original vision. Some are installed along with Windows itself. Thanks for articulating the obvious. You have to do that with every dll in the folder of your executable as they can also have unresolveable dependencies. This is because the major point of my posts is to aid in the learning process. Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable contains code developed, tested, supported, and updated by Microsoft, which makes this package a reliable option for both software developers and users. On the other hand, if you have five programs using the Visual C++ Redistributable, there only needs to be one copy of it on your computer, installed by the first of the five to have been installed.
Instead, they use this collection of pre-written and very thoroughly-tested software. If you uninstall a program, that program will not automatically remove the redistributable upon which it relied, since it has no way of knowing if other applications also rely upon it. Whichever route you take, make sure you first! This way you might accumulate different versions, but at least there would be only one copy of each version, which everyone who needed that version could share. What is Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable and do I need it? The problem even has a name: Hell. In my case the version was 9.
Any samples given are not meant to have error checking or show best practices. I am pretty sure these are taking up a lot of space on my hard drive and could be running in the background when not needed. This is sometimes extremely useful. Support for that ended years ago, and most of the industry is now working toward getting away from 7 or 8 and going to 10, if not already there. This is why it should be optional just like the. I have written a separate article that addresses the issue.